Rickenbacker with Paul McCartney finish -- $2,800 Reverb
Rickenbacker with Paul McCartney finish -- $2,800 Reverb
https://reverb.com/item/33627511-ricken ... mmt-custom
Similar to this one:
https://youtu.be/iHRyCBFLMxI
Similar to this one:
https://youtu.be/iHRyCBFLMxI
- Attachments
-
- Untitled.jpg (94.87 KiB) Viewed 17385 times
Re: Rickenbacker with Paul McCartney finish -- $2,800 Reverb
Hmmm......nope.
Re: Rickenbacker with Paul McCartney finish -- $2,800 Reverb
tomdbass wrote:Hmmm......nope.
Seconded.
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id= ... ef=profile
www.twitter.com/ReallyMattRoss
Penguins is practically chickens.
www.twitter.com/ReallyMattRoss
Penguins is practically chickens.
Re: Rickenbacker with Paul McCartney finish -- $2,800 Reverb
...And another nope!
Re: Rickenbacker with Paul McCartney finish -- $2,800 Reverb
You could go the cheap Asian knockoff route for a lot cheaper:
http://dcustomguitar.com/custom-paul-mc ... xtEALw_wcB
Didn't Ronn from The Eggmen own one of these? I don't think he's been on our forum for years though.
http://dcustomguitar.com/custom-paul-mc ... xtEALw_wcB
Didn't Ronn from The Eggmen own one of these? I don't think he's been on our forum for years though.
Re: Rickenbacker with Paul McCartney finish -- $2,800 Reverb
pjmuck wrote:You could go the cheap Asian knockoff route for a lot cheaper:
http://dcustomguitar.com/custom-paul-mc ... xtEALw_wcB
Didn't Ronn from The Eggmen own one of these? I don't think he's been on our forum for years though.
Yeah he had it refinished though
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id= ... ef=profile
www.twitter.com/ReallyMattRoss
Penguins is practically chickens.
www.twitter.com/ReallyMattRoss
Penguins is practically chickens.
Re: Rickenbacker with Paul McCartney finish -- $2,800 Reverb
All custom work was done by Famous Guitar Replicas who did an absolutely amazing job
just sit on that for a moment
just sit on that for a moment
Re: Rickenbacker with Paul McCartney finish -- $2,800 Reverb
Help me understand, maybe it’s just me... what is the attraction... if anybody else took a Rick and F-ed up the finish like this, they’d be an idiot- but because McCartney did it, it’s cool? Did anyone actually think his looked good? I guess if you’re in a Beatles cover band... but somebody paid good money to have this done? 
- Upsidedown
- Posts: 108
- Joined: October 19th, 2017, 4:48 am
- Location: Mid Wales UK
Re: Rickenbacker with Paul McCartney finish -- $2,800 Reverb
I thought it was just me because I generally don't "get" much visual art. Design is something I'm very much into, and that "artwork" just sh!ts all over a classic and beautiful instrument design.
You can call me Jim
Re: Rickenbacker with Paul McCartney finish -- $2,800 Reverb
Before he was Sir Paul, he was a great bassist/composer/singer- in the World's pre-eminent rock/ pop band. Remember- he was given that Rickenbacker as I recall- and in that period, he and his mates were experimenting with psychedeic drugs. 'Nuff said.
I know he had that finish removed, I think it's a cream color now.
I know he had that finish removed, I think it's a cream color now.
Re: Rickenbacker with Paul McCartney finish -- $2,800 Reverb
He sanded it down to the natural wood, and that's how it remained, unfinished. It changed the dimensions of the horns and body.LHBASSIST wrote:Before he was Sir Paul, he was a great bassist/composer/singer- in the World's pre-eminent rock/ pop band. Remember- he was given that Rickenbacker as I recall- and in that period, he and his mates were experimenting with psychedeic drugs. 'Nuff said.
I know he had that finish removed, I think it's a cream color now.
He hasn't used it live in years, though I know he was still using it for sound checks in the 90s.
Re: Rickenbacker with Paul McCartney finish -- $2,800 Reverb
Yep! Rickenbacker sold a tribute version for a while, the 4001c64s.ch willie wrote:He sanded it down to the natural wood, and that's how it remained, unfinished. It changed the dimensions of the horns and body.LHBASSIST wrote:Before he was Sir Paul, he was a great bassist/composer/singer- in the World's pre-eminent rock/ pop band. Remember- he was given that Rickenbacker as I recall- and in that period, he and his mates were experimenting with psychedeic drugs. 'Nuff said.
I know he had that finish removed, I think it's a cream color now.
Re: Rickenbacker with Paul McCartney finish -- $2,800 Reverb
Yep, and despite the major hatchet job he did on it, it remains the most valuable Rick in the world thanks to it being his.ch willie wrote:He sanded it down to the natural wood, and that's how it remained, unfinished. It changed the dimensions of the horns and body.LHBASSIST wrote:Before he was Sir Paul, he was a great bassist/composer/singer- in the World's pre-eminent rock/ pop band. Remember- he was given that Rickenbacker as I recall- and in that period, he and his mates were experimenting with psychedeic drugs. 'Nuff said.
I know he had that finish removed, I think it's a cream color now.
He hasn't used it live in years, though I know he was still using it for sound checks in the 90s.
Re: Rickenbacker with Paul McCartney finish -- $2,800 Reverb
We all appreciate the historical value of his actual original bass- but you have to go deep down the rabbit hole of fandom to invest a perfectly good Rick and a bunch of money on replicating something as hideous as that finish... even Macca himself sanded it off 
Last edited by Carmine on May 16th, 2020, 12:40 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Rickenbacker with Paul McCartney finish -- $2,800 Reverb
Chris Squire did a similar “custom” refinishing to his Ric prior to Yes. He had it stripped off and refinished in an off white.
Re: Rickenbacker with Paul McCartney finish -- $2,800 Reverb
If my 4001 wasn't bound, I'd have it sanded down too. I was 8 years old in 1970 and was a huge Beatles fan. When I was 12 and started playing bass, I wanted a 4001s so bad. I had and still have a huge poster of McCartney playing it, a close up. For the next 5 years, I wanted one so much. finally got a job that allowed me to save and buy one in maple glo, my fave instrument still. In short, I love his sanding job on the Ric. Wish I had one of those special run Macca basses they made.pjmuck wrote:Yep, and despite the major hatchet job he did on it, it remains the most valuable Rick in the world thanks to it being his.ch willie wrote:He sanded it down to the natural wood, and that's how it remained, unfinished. It changed the dimensions of the horns and body.LHBASSIST wrote:Before he was Sir Paul, he was a great bassist/composer/singer- in the World's pre-eminent rock/ pop band. Remember- he was given that Rickenbacker as I recall- and in that period, he and his mates were experimenting with psychedeic drugs. 'Nuff said.
I know he had that finish removed, I think it's a cream color now.
He hasn't used it live in years, though I know he was still using it for sound checks in the 90s.
Re: Rickenbacker with Paul McCartney finish -- $2,800 Reverb
Wasn't Squire's 4001 also shaved down a few mm to make the body thinner?tomdbass wrote:Chris Squire did a similar “custom” refinishing to his Ric prior to Yes. He had it stripped off and refinished in an off white.
Re: Rickenbacker with Paul McCartney finish -- $2,800 Reverb
I think you may be right Jeroen. I remember reading something like that about it.Jeroen wrote:Wasn't Squire's 4001 also shaved down a few mm to make the body thinner?tomdbass wrote:Chris Squire did a similar “custom” refinishing to his Ric prior to Yes. He had it stripped off and refinished in an off white.
Re: Rickenbacker with Paul McCartney finish -- $2,800 Reverb
I believe you're right about Chris Squire's 4001s. It's an amazing bass too. I won't put flats on mine because I love the growl that Rics get, like his.
- Upsidedown
- Posts: 108
- Joined: October 19th, 2017, 4:48 am
- Location: Mid Wales UK
Re: Rickenbacker with Paul McCartney finish -- $2,800 Reverb
As a Brit, so many players I saw as a kid used the S models I had no idea until much later that they were not the standard design.
You can call me Jim