82 Rick 4001
Re: 82 Rick 4001
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id= ... ef=profile
www.twitter.com/ReallyMattRoss
Penguins is practically chickens.
www.twitter.com/ReallyMattRoss
Penguins is practically chickens.
Re: 82 Rick 4001
Didn't those basses originally come with the horseshoe bridge PUP?
- superheavydeathmetal
- Posts: 1282
- Joined: November 20th, 2013, 6:09 pm
- Location: Cincinnati
Re: 82 Rick 4001
This is not a C64S, and as far as I can tell, it isn't even a C64. It looks like a re-branded 4001S.
A C64 should have vintage-style tone-knobs:

And a C64 should have a pickguard that goes all the way to the bridge surround, and the bridge surround should be trapezoidal, not square:

Just to be clear, the reissue horseshoe pickup works like a normal pickup (meaning the horseshoe isn't part of the pickup), but voiced to sound like the original horseshoe pickup as much as possible. It also has a gap in the pickup cover to look more like the original:

RIC did away with the "real" horseshoe pickup because they are notorious for losing their magnetism, which requires them to be re-gaussed.
A C64 should have vintage-style tone-knobs:
And a C64 should have a pickguard that goes all the way to the bridge surround, and the bridge surround should be trapezoidal, not square:
Yes, and this is not a reissue horseshoe pickup. The reissue horseshoe has very large silver pole pieces.pjmuck wrote:Didn't those basses originally come with the horseshoe bridge PUP?
Just to be clear, the reissue horseshoe pickup works like a normal pickup (meaning the horseshoe isn't part of the pickup), but voiced to sound like the original horseshoe pickup as much as possible. It also has a gap in the pickup cover to look more like the original:
RIC did away with the "real" horseshoe pickup because they are notorious for losing their magnetism, which requires them to be re-gaussed.
Last edited by superheavydeathmetal on December 2nd, 2015, 8:33 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Gilmourisgod wrote:I never really "got" what a Rick is capable of until I ran it stereo a few times in my college band. We used to call it the "Piano of Doom". You get all the bottom and all the top in total a**kicking mode.
Re: 82 Rick 4001
I'm no Ric expert, but all of these attributes on one Ric bass seems odd:
- toaster pickup, 1" from neck
- two-piece neck
- open back tuners
- no binding, dot inlay
- serial 1982
- one-piece pick guard
- bridge with extra two screws near tail
- no center stripe
???
- toaster pickup, 1" from neck
- two-piece neck
- open back tuners
- no binding, dot inlay
- serial 1982
- one-piece pick guard
- bridge with extra two screws near tail
- no center stripe
???
Last edited by bbl on December 2nd, 2015, 10:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- superheavydeathmetal
- Posts: 1282
- Joined: November 20th, 2013, 6:09 pm
- Location: Cincinnati
Re: 82 Rick 4001
Geoff,bbl wrote:I'm no Ric expert, but all of these attributes on one Ric bass seems odd:
- toaster pickup, 1" from neck <- Good catch!
- two-piece neck <- I am not sure.
- open back tuners <- I am not sure.
- no binding, dot inlay <- This is correct for a C64.
- serial 1982 <- This is way too early for a C64.
- one-piece pick guard <-This is correct for a C64.
- bridge with extra two screws near tail <- Good catch!
???
Good detective work! See my comments in red.
Yeah, nothing about this is right.
Gilmourisgod wrote:I never really "got" what a Rick is capable of until I ran it stereo a few times in my college band. We used to call it the "Piano of Doom". You get all the bottom and all the top in total a**kicking mode.
Re: 82 Rick 4001
And no center stripe.
A 4003S with a toaster replacement?
An SB?
A 4003S with a toaster replacement?
An SB?
Re: 82 Rick 4001
Great info, thanks. I knew it didn't look "right", but I'm not that knowledgeable on the various differences with Ricks.superheavydeathmetal wrote:This is not a C64S, and as far as I can tell, it isn't even a C64. It looks like a re-branded 4001S.
A C64 should have vintage-style tone-knobs:
And a C64 should have a pickguard that goes all the way to the bridge surround, and the bridge surround should be trapezoidal, not square:
Yes, and this is not a reissue horseshoe pickup. The reissue horseshoe has very large silver pole pieces.pjmuck wrote:Didn't those basses originally come with the horseshoe bridge PUP?
Just to be clear, the reissue horseshoe pickup works like a normal pickup (meaning the horseshoe isn't part of the pickup), but voiced to sound like the original horseshoe pickup as much as possible. It also has a gap in the pickup cover to look more like the original:
RIC did away with the "real" horseshoe pickup because they are notorious for losing their magnetism, which requires them to be re-gaussed.
- AustinLeftyBass
- Posts: 825
- Joined: March 13th, 2008, 6:40 am
- Location: Austin,Texas
- Contact:
Re: 82 Rick 4001
Looks like a 4003SB to me.
"Top 10 Best Bass Players" Austin Music Poll 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010
- jayceofbass
- Posts: 373
- Joined: November 20th, 2011, 7:56 am
- Location: Toronto, ON - Canada
- Contact:
Re: 82 Rick 4001
I could be wrong but... I think the 4003SB would have stereo outputs. This mystery bass does not.AustinLeftyBass wrote:Looks like a 4003SB to me.
Sometimes I think, maybe I'm lucky I'm left handed. If I could play any bass I wanted, my collection would REALLY be out of control.
http://whitecowbell.com
http://www.facebook.com/southpawl.jones
http://goo.gl/rMTPk
http://whitecowbell.com
http://www.facebook.com/southpawl.jones
http://goo.gl/rMTPk
- superheavydeathmetal
- Posts: 1282
- Joined: November 20th, 2013, 6:09 pm
- Location: Cincinnati
Re: 82 Rick 4001
The listing has been changed to an SB. But I don't know that it is an SB, either. The SB would have the stereo output, a two-piece pickguard, and closed tuners.jayceofbass wrote:I could be wrong but... I think the 4003SB would have stereo outputs. This mystery bass does not.AustinLeftyBass wrote:Looks like a 4003SB to me.
On the other hand, I have heard that specs of the SB varied quite a bit, so maybe an SB is just whatever Rick decided to call an SB at the time.
Gilmourisgod wrote:I never really "got" what a Rick is capable of until I ran it stereo a few times in my college band. We used to call it the "Piano of Doom". You get all the bottom and all the top in total a**kicking mode.
Re: 82 Rick 4001
Yeah, Rickenbacker replaced the Horseshoe bridge pick up, and the toaster at the neck, with Hi-Gains in late summer of 1973. They did away with the checkerboard binding a few months before that. I know; my '73 4001 was "born" in October, so I just missed out... Still has the "Wavy Grover" tuners, though... So, that one wouldn't have them, and IIRC, any Rick made after '73 with a Horse shoe, would have a Repro one. And yes, the original horse shoes did have problems with losing magnetism. John Hall has stated more than once that they were a nightmare to make, too. I know someone was making copies of the originals (can't remember who), until they got sued (there's a big surprise); I do remember reading that they said that yes, they were a royal PITA to make - and they were priced accordingly. I do know they settled out of court; whether the pickups are available or not, I couldn't say..