LeftyBassist.com
http://leftybassist.com/

Alembic Stanley Clarke -- $13,000 Reverb
http://leftybassist.com/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=9156
Page 1 of 1

Author:  tim [ April 4th, 2018, 10:25 am ]
Post subject:  Alembic Stanley Clarke -- $13,000 Reverb

https://reverb.com/item/11180438-alembi ... -bass-mint

Just for kicks, the Kelly BB value of my car is about $16k...

Attachments:
Alembic.JPG
Alembic.JPG [ 55.96 KiB | Viewed 6061 times ]

Author:  Matt R. [ April 4th, 2018, 10:31 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Alembic Stanley Clarke -- $13,000 Reverb

Cool looking bass, but damn. :shock:

Author:  bobjones2260 [ April 4th, 2018, 12:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Alembic Stanley Clarke -- $13,000 Reverb

I would like to see what the case looks like as it alone is a $450 value.

Author:  paulo [ April 4th, 2018, 12:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Alembic Stanley Clarke -- $13,000 Reverb

bobjones2260 wrote:
I would like to see what the case looks like as it alone is a $450 value.

That looks like a Fender G&G case

Author:  AzWhoFan [ April 5th, 2018, 7:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Alembic Stanley Clarke -- $13,000 Reverb

Holy #(^%&!&^~! I remember when I could have bought a mint used one for $900 25 years ago. But folks were didding them big time because of the short scale and claims they would not intonate properly ...
I am now kicking myself in the butt big-time! :shock: :shock: :shock:

Author:  Upsidedown [ April 6th, 2018, 2:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Alembic Stanley Clarke -- $13,000 Reverb

I don't usually like multi-wood builds, but they are really nice looking.
Proportions don't look shorty - I'd always assumed they were more like 32".

Is the tail/anchor off centre?
Image
...position of "G" saddle relative to "D" saddle looks off to me.
Some 30" shorties work better with medium scale strings, but you probably have to fuss about with gauges to get good, regular intonation?

I've never looked that close to an Alembic - they have always been too expensive for my blood - but see those screws close to a timber joint line? That's bad engineering as it tends to encourage splitting along that join, particularly if its close to the body edge.

Author:  gravesbass [ April 6th, 2018, 8:22 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Alembic Stanley Clarke -- $13,000 Reverb

wow, good eye. That is off center and crooked. Ill offer 5k because its off center ;)

Author:  pjmuck [ April 6th, 2018, 9:30 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Alembic Stanley Clarke -- $13,000 Reverb

A $13,000 bass is necessary to make music. Said no one.

Author:  NoXX [ April 6th, 2018, 10:03 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Alembic Stanley Clarke -- $13,000 Reverb

I assumed the price included hand delivery by Stanley himself? (like Gene Simmons is doing with his new Box Set) :mrgreen:

Author:  sblueplanet [ April 8th, 2018, 2:30 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Alembic Stanley Clarke -- $13,000 Reverb

I think the future expense in furniture polish to keep this looking tip-top has just pushed this bass out my price bracket :mrgreen:

Author:  fivebass52 [ April 8th, 2018, 5:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Alembic Stanley Clarke -- $13,000 Reverb

Upsidedown wrote:
I don't usually like multi-wood builds, but they are really nice looking.
Proportions don't look shorty - I'd always assumed they were more like 32".

Is the tail/anchor off centre?
Image
...position of "G" saddle relative to "D" saddle looks off to me.
Some 30" shorties work better with medium scale strings, but you probably have to fuss about with gauges to get good, regular intonation?

I've never looked that close to an Alembic - they have always been too expensive for my blood - but see those screws close to a timber joint line? That's bad engineering as it tends to encourage splitting along that join, particularly if its close to the body edge.


I''m surprised Alembic missed this in QC, didn't correct it, and allowed it out the door.. I wonder if the seller knows of this? If he's the original buyer, he should send it back and have the tailpiece correctly re-installed...especially for That price...

Author:  fivebass52 [ April 8th, 2018, 6:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Alembic Stanley Clarke -- $13,000 Reverb

Sent the seller this post, curious to see what his response will be...

"Hello,

Just wondering if you're aware that your seventh picture, showing a close-up of the bridge section, shows that the string retainer has apparently been installed crookedly, and to the left of the center neck stringer... hard to imagine this getting past Alembic QC... or is the picture itself distorting the alignment?

No disrespect to you, and a beautiful bass, but thought you would want to know...

Ian

Author:  fivebass52 [ April 8th, 2018, 6:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Alembic Stanley Clarke -- $13,000 Reverb

fivebass52 wrote:
Sent the seller this post, curious to see what his response will be...

"Hello,

Just wondering if you're aware that your seventh picture, showing a close-up of the bridge section, shows that the string retainer has apparently been installed crookedly, and to the left of the center neck stringer... hard to imagine this getting past Alembic QC... or is the picture itself distorting the alignment?

No disrespect to you, and a beautiful bass, but thought you would want to know...

Ian"


Got this reply back from the seller...

"This is correct. The bridge is exactly centered for proper alignment with the neck. The brass string retainer is 1mm off center to even out the stress of the string tails, the E being straight down & the G being ever so slightly angled."


Sent this back to him...

Thanks for the quick reply... In looking back at the picture, I see what you mean... makes me wonder if all SC models have the same offset?

His reply back...

Most have 2 stringers & the offset is less noticeable. Mine has 3 stringers.

I have a friend who has a right hand Stanley Clark model... I'll contact him, and see if he notices the offset on string retainer...

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/